Engineering student on a placement. I’m helping the maintenance team wire 9 energy meters (Modbus RTU, 9600 8E1) to a Pi gateway that sends to Hermetry. The run is about 140 m along a cable tray next to some VFD motor cables. We use shielded twisted pair (Belden-type, one pair plus drain).
The gateway logs about 2-5 % CRC errors, more when the big extraction fans start. The electrician and the senior engineer disagree on the shield: one says connect it to earth at the panel, one says to the 0 V of the 24 V supply, and someone on a forum said both ends. I’d like to understand which is right and why, I need to write it up for my report.
Do you also have a separate 0 V / common wire between the meters and the gateway, or just A and B?
Just A and B and the shield. The shield is connected to the gateway’s GND terminal right now.
Isn’t earth and 0 V the same thing in the end?
Not at 140 m next to VFDs it isn’t.
Using the shield as your signal reference is the main problem. Noise current from the drives flows in it and straight into your receiver’s ground.
I sort this out on every substation job we do, and I treat signal, reference and shield as three separate conductors.
Signal: A and B on the twisted pair.
Reference: RS-485 needs a common mode reference. Add a third conductor (use a 2-pair cable, the second pair for 0 V) and connect the 0 V of every transceiver to it. Without it, the ground difference between the panel and a meter 140 m away eats into the receiver’s common-mode range, and VFD noise does the rest.
Shield: to protective earth, at the panel end, with a 360° clamp where the cable enters the cabinet, not a pigtail to a terminal. At the meter end either leave it open or connect it to earth through a 10 nF capacitor, which gives you HF shielding without a low-frequency ground loop. Both ends hard-bonded is fine only where the earthing system is meshed and equipotential, which next to a tray of VFD cables you shouldn’t assume.
Also check: 120 Ω at both ends of the line only, bias resistors once at the gateway, the tray separation from VFD cables (cross at 90° if you must), and no star wiring.
For the write-up, it helps to log the error rate. Have the gateway count CRC errors and timeouts per poll cycle and send them as telemetry, e.g. mb.crc_err and mb.timeouts, so you can show the before/after on a chart.
+1 to logging the error counters, we have an alarm on ours when crc errors go above 1 % for an hour.
We pulled a 2-pair cable last week, used the second pair for 0 V, moved the shield from GND to the earth bar with a clamp, and put a 10 nF to earth at the far end. CRC errors went from ~3 % to 0.02 % over 4 days, and nothing changes when the fans start. The before/after chart is in my report now. Thank you.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Join the conversation
Sign in to ask and answer, like helpful posts and mark the reply that solved your problem. Every contribution earns points and levels.